cashcrown // ai quality evaluation
An evaluation harness for LLM/RAG systems: a golden set, automated metrics, an LLM-as-judge calibrated against human labels, and a regression gate that blocks a deploy when quality drops.

Without evaluation you do not know whether a new prompt, model, or RAG change improved quality or quietly broke it. Eyeballing answers does not scale and does not catch regressions before they reach the customer.
Select a node to see its description and data flow.
We work in ranges that depend on scope — we start with a fixed-cost pilot in which we build the golden set and the first regression gate. An eval usually pays off at the first regression it catches before it reaches the customer — it saves hours of manual review and costly slips. Calculate the return in the ROI calculator.
Yes. We run the harness in your CI as a gate before deploy — a red result blocks the release. It runs self-hosted with zero retention: test data and embeddings (BGE-M3) stay with you, we mask PII before the cloud and handle sensitive paths locally — GDPR and AI Act compliance designed in from the start.
We start with a few dozen representative cases and their manual labels — that is the golden set we calibrate the LLM-as-judge against. An eval supplements but never replaces human judgement on high-stakes outputs: the automation catches regressions and tracks the trend, while a human makes the critical calls and has the final say at the gate.